Labora et Invenies: Uma Perspetiva Alquímica sobre Frankenstein (1818), de Mary Shelley

Authors

  • Patrícia Passos de Sá School of Arts and Humanities of the University of Lisbon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51427/com.est.2022.0006

Keywords:

Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, Frankenstein’s monster, creator, creature, alchemy, shadow, light, transmutation

Abstract

It is undeniable that, in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818), the teachings of alchemy masters were crucial to Victor Frankenstein’s development as a natural philosopher. Nevertheless, despite having abandoned them in favor of the study of the most recent scientific theories of the time, Victor retained the same fascination for those teachings that made him wish to uncover the mysteries of Nature and reach for the impossible: to erase the barrier between life and death. Therefore, in the present essay, we intend to analyze Shelley’s work in accordance to the precepts of alchemy. Studies such as Irving H. Buchen’s, “Frankenstein and the Alchemy of Creation” (1977), and Asunción López-Varela Azcárate and Estefanía Saavedra’s, “The Metamorphosis of the Myth of Alquemy in the Romantic Imagination of Mary and Percy B. Shelley” (2017), have already delved into the topic, but our perspective innovates in the sense that it privileges alchemy’s metaphorical side, as the art of purification of the “Self” through a process of transmutation, which aims at the union of spirit and matter, light and shadow, in a Whole. Consequently, we seek to determine the way through which Victor and his creature’s transmutation occurs, as well as whether the alchemists’ goal to convert lead, or the vices and earthly passions, into gold, or virtues, is achieved. Thus, we begin by defining what alchemy is; next, we analyze its role in Shelley’s novel; and, finally, we assess the sort of transmutation that transpires in Frankenstein.

Author Biography

  • Patrícia Passos de Sá, School of Arts and Humanities of the University of Lisbon

    Patrícia Passos de Sá has a degree in Languages, Literatures and Cultures and is pursuing a Master's degree in Comparative Studies at the School of Arts and Humanities of the University of Lisbon. Currently, she is writing her dissertation on literary echoes of Frankenstein. She has collaborated with Jogos Florais, a poetry and criticism website. She is an author in the anthology of horror short stories, Sangue Novo (2021), and soon she will have another story published in the anthology Sangue, by Edições Trebaruna. She works as a content writer at Fábrica do Terror, a website dedicated to promoting horror artworks in Portugal.

References

Anes, José Manuel. 2014. Uma Introdução ao Esoterismo Ocidental e suas Iniciações, Lisboa: Arranha-céus.

Buchen, Irving H. 1977. “Frankenstein and the Alchemy of Creation and Evolution.” The Wordsworth Circle 8 (2): 103–12. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24039234.

Burckhardt, Titus. 2001. Alquimia. Ciência do cosmos, ciência da alma. Tradução de Bruno Costa Magalhães. Louisville Kentucky: Fons Vitae.

Centeno, Yvette K. 2011. “A Gnose Alquímica.” Cadernos do CEIL. Revista Multidisciplinar de Estudos sobre o Imaginário (1): 152-171. https://research.unl.pt/ws/portalfiles/portal/3736964/Yvette_Centeno_A_gnose_alqui_mica_outrora_e_agora.pdf.

—. 1987. Literatura e Alquimia. Ensaios, Lisboa: Editorial Presença.

Chevalier, Jean, e Gheerbrant, Alain. 2010. “Alquimia.” In Dicionário dos Símbolos, tradução de Cristina Rodriguez e Artur Guerra, 56-57. Lisboa: Editorial Teorema.

Copenhaver, Brian, org. e trad. 2015. The Book of Magic. From Antiquity to the Enlightenment, UK: Penguin Books.

Ellis, Markman. 1999. “Fictions of Science in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Sydney’s Studies in English 25: 1-20. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/SSE/article/view/537.

Golbort, Robert C. 2002. “Frankenstein. (character and work).” In Encyclopedia of Literature and Science, edição de Pamela Gossin, 160. Westport & London: Greenwood Press.

Haynes, Rosalynn D. 1994. “Frankenstein and the Monster.” In From Faust to Strangelove. Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature, 92-103. Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hindle, Maurice. 2003. Notas de Frankenstein. Or the Modern Prometheus, 266-273. Autoria de Mary Shelley. London: Penguin Books.

Jung, C. G. 1968. The Collected Works of C. G. Jung. Psychology and Alchemy, edição de Herbert Read, Michael Fordham, M.D., M.R.C.P., Gerhard Adler, Ph.D, William McGuire. Tradução de R.F.C. Hull, Bollingen Series XX. New York: Princeton University Press.

—. 1983. The Collected Works of C. G. Jung. Volume 13: Alchemical Studies, edição de Sir Herbert Read, Michael Fordham, M.D., M.R.C.P., Gerhard Adler, Ph.D, William McGuire. Tradução de R.F.C. Hull, Bollingen Series XX. New York: Princeton University Press.

López-Varela Azcárate, Asunción, e Saavedra, Estefanía. 2017. “The Metamorphosis of the Myth of Alquemy in the Romantic Imagination of Mary and Percy B. Shelley.” Icono 14. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías emergentes 15 (1): 108-127. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v15i1.1036.

Ramsay, Jay. 1999. O Caminho do Alquimista. A Arte da Transformação. Tradução de Isabel Sequeira. Mira-Sintra–Mem-Martins: Publicações Europa-América.

Shelley, Mary. 2003. Frankenstein. Or the Modern Prometheus. Edição, introdução e notas de Maurice Hindle. London: Penguin Books.

Published

05-05-2022

How to Cite

“Labora Et Invenies: Uma Perspetiva Alquímica Sobre Frankenstein (1818), De Mary Shelley”. 2022. Estrema: Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities 2 (1): 134-57. https://doi.org/10.51427/com.est.2022.0006.